Extremism refers to the actions or ideologies of individuals or groups that violate common standards of ethics and of which are outside the perceived political centre of society. Extremist groups are commonly driven by racial purity, anti-Semitism, political hegemony, anti-liberal and anti-government forces; with their dedication and energy predominately invested into recruitment and “immunising” their members from the effects of the mass media. Extremists demonstrate their faithfulness by being a firm supporter in the freedom of expression and speech. With the capacity to reach a broad range of individuals and groups, extremists frequently and regularly utilise electronic communication mediums such as the internet to spread or promote their messages, employ new members and protest against current policies, regulations, practices or beliefs.
Research conducted showed that the most prevailing and dominating type of extremist group is that of white Americans, although not all constitute a positive approach. The Hammerskin Nation and National Alliance are two largely active Neo-Nazi groups made up of individuals from the white race; of whom which practice “leaderless resistance”, are organised into cells like the Nazi SS divisions and place a strong emphasis on violence. As these groups are very much established upon the basis of immorality, why is it that they have the capacity to be significantly overpowering on the internet as well as over other non-white extremist groups that have more ethical intentions?
The vast degree to which extremism is publicised is mainly due to the introduction and utilisation of the internet, as it provides a “service” whereby propaganda or material of any nature can be posted and viewed. Web pages on this controversial topic are readily available and accessible at the click of a finger, which could provide one reason as to why Neo-Nazi organisations such as the Hammerskin Nation and National Alliance are still heavily present in today’s evolving society. Within virtually every white extremist group or organisation’s webpage, a link is provided to the National Alliance; which illustrates the extent to which Neo-Nazism still remains acknowledged and supported.
It becomes fair to say that each individual is essentially in control of the information they view and receive. While this is easily the case for adults or frequent users of the internet, the vulnerability of youths continues to remain at stake. As with any other detrimental or offensive material, adequate supervision or regulations should be placed on extremist propaganda; as it does have the potential to significantly influence the minds and thinking patterns of children. Unlike older generations that have already established their opinions, views and beliefs on various topics of concern, extremists can be a significant threat to younger people and even those that have not taken or adopted a particular stance in relation to these issues. For a majority of people however, extremists in cyberspace are not necessarily of any particular interest to them; which ultimately reflects on these groups’ continuous struggle to convince outsiders that what THEY believe is “constitutionally acceptable”.
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment